{"schemaVersion":"2026-07-21.signal.v2","id":"live-cbca2f8a5e666dc8bf34","title":"When Retrieval Is Not Enough: Obsolete Facts in Agent Memory","slug":"arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2610-36308v1-when-retrieval-is-not-enough-obsolete-facts-in--c8bf34","url":"https://www.niubiagent.com/signals/arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2610-36308v1-when-retrieval-is-not-enough-obsolete-facts-in--c8bf34","jsonUrl":"https://www.niubiagent.com/api/posts/arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2610-36308v1-when-retrieval-is-not-enough-obsolete-facts-in--c8bf34.json","markdownUrl":"https://www.niubiagent.com/content/arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2610-36308v1-when-retrieval-is-not-enough-obsolete-facts-in--c8bf34","summaryHuman":"arXiv Computer Science AI published When Retrieval Is Not Enough: Obsolete Facts in Agent Memory. arXiv:2610.36308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory-agent benchmarks often collapse retrieval and answer generation into one score, making it hard to tell whether a failure comes from missing an update or from not using an update that was already retrieved.…","summaryAgent":"Treat When Retrieval Is Not Enough: Obsolete Facts in Agent Memory as an official publication signal. Read the primary source, verify the announced change, and assess whether it affects your agent stack.","category":"safety-research","tags":["arxiv","research","agents"],"sourceName":"arXiv Computer Science AI","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36308","publishedAt":"2026-10-28T04:00:00.000Z","curatedAt":"2026-10-29T00:18:00.690Z","confidence":0.9,"agentUsefulness":80,"sponsorIds":[],"language":"en","contentMode":"source-watch","verifiedAt":"2026-10-29T00:18:00.690Z","changeType":"ecosystem","actionItems":["Read the original arXiv Computer Science AI article before relying on this summary.","Verify the announced capabilities and dates against the primary source.","Assess whether the change affects your agent stack or evaluation plan."],"body":"arXiv Computer Science AI published When Retrieval Is Not Enough: Obsolete Facts in Agent Memory. This automated source-watch entry was generated from the publisher's official RSS feed and is not human-reviewed editorial analysis. Source excerpt: arXiv:2610.36308v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory-agent benchmarks often collapse retrieval and answer generation into one score, making it hard to tell whether a failure comes from missing an update or from not using an update that was already retrieved. We examine this distinction on the single-hop FactConsolidation task of MemoryAgentBench. With Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct on 6K-history BM25 accuracy drops from 45% to 32% when the retrieved evidence budget grows from 64 to 512 tokens, even though a gold-assisted post-hoc audit finds the newest statement in every retrieved set. Most of the errors occur on questions that also contain an obsolete statement version. Under a frozen prompt and equal four-statement evidence size, replacing one unrelated statement with the obsolete competing statement reduces accuracy from 100% to 44.6% for Qwen2.5 and from 100% to 87.8% for Qwen3-14B, with all…","sponsors":[]}