{"schemaVersion":"2026-07-21.signal.v2","id":"live-cfd5af5fe7b58eac3076","title":"Closed-Loop Agent Evaluation: Layered Measurement and Self-Calibration","slug":"arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2611-07051v1-closed-loop-agent-evaluation-layered-measuremen-ac3076","url":"https://www.niubiagent.com/signals/arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2611-07051v1-closed-loop-agent-evaluation-layered-measuremen-ac3076","jsonUrl":"https://www.niubiagent.com/api/posts/arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2611-07051v1-closed-loop-agent-evaluation-layered-measuremen-ac3076.json","markdownUrl":"https://www.niubiagent.com/content/arxiv-cs-ai-oai-arxiv-org-2611-07051v1-closed-loop-agent-evaluation-layered-measuremen-ac3076","summaryHuman":"arXiv Computer Science AI published Closed-Loop Agent Evaluation: Layered Measurement and Self-Calibration. arXiv:2611.07051v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Once an agent is live, teams want to know whether it is doing its job, not just whether it throws errors. Yet most evaluation is one-off: a benchmark run, a look at traces, a single score. Its…","summaryAgent":"Treat Closed-Loop Agent Evaluation: Layered Measurement and Self-Calibration as an official publication signal. Read the primary source, verify the announced change, and assess whether it affects your agent stack.","category":"safety-research","tags":["arxiv","research","agents"],"sourceName":"arXiv Computer Science AI","sourceUrl":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07051","publishedAt":"2026-11-06T05:00:00.000Z","curatedAt":"2026-11-07T00:18:01.542Z","confidence":0.9,"agentUsefulness":80,"sponsorIds":[],"language":"en","contentMode":"source-watch","verifiedAt":"2026-11-07T00:18:01.542Z","changeType":"ecosystem","actionItems":["Read the original arXiv Computer Science AI article before relying on this summary.","Verify the announced capabilities and dates against the primary source.","Assess whether the change affects your agent stack or evaluation plan."],"body":"arXiv Computer Science AI published Closed-Loop Agent Evaluation: Layered Measurement and Self-Calibration. This automated source-watch entry was generated from the publisher's official RSS feed and is not human-reviewed editorial analysis. Source excerpt: arXiv:2611.07051v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Once an agent is live, teams want to know whether it is doing its job, not just whether it throws errors. Yet most evaluation is one-off: a benchmark run, a look at traces, a single score. Its conclusions neither check themselves nor reach the agent. We propose closed-loop evaluation, an evaluation method for deployed agents. It models evaluation as performance estimation under biased raters and censored outcomes, and it requires every level's conclusion to trace back to atomic data and to be computed by versioned rules. The method covers four levels of analysis (span, trace, conversation and engagement), measures along a spine of Execution, Substance, Trajectory and Results, treats Conduct as a constraint throughout, and uses Provenance and Adjudication components to certify the evidence and the evaluators. Evaluator agents generated by…","sponsors":[]}