Safety ResearchAutomated source watch

The Harness as the Only Mutable Surface: Compliance-Bounded Self-Evolution of LLM Agents in Credit Pipelines, with a Measured Admission Gate

arXiv Computer Science AI published The Harness as the Only Mutable Surface: Compliance-Bounded Self-Evolution of LLM Agents in Credit Pipelines, with a Measured Admission Gate. arXiv:2610.10629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-improving LLM agents can adapt a credit pipeline to a changed rule, but an agent that rewrites itself destroys the artefact a…

Human read

Why this signal matters

arXiv Computer Science AI published The Harness as the Only Mutable Surface: Compliance-Bounded Self-Evolution of LLM Agents in Credit Pipelines, with a Measured Admission Gate. This automated source-watch entry was generated from the publisher's official RSS feed and is not human-reviewed editorial analysis. Source excerpt: arXiv:2610.10629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-improving LLM agents can adapt a credit pipeline to a changed rule, but an agent that rewrites itself destroys the artefact a supervisor reviews: a named change, a recorded test, an approval. We argue that self-evolution is reviewable only if it is confined to the runtime harness (instruction text, tool-call logic and primitive composition) while model weights stay fixed, so that every adaptation is a diff with a cause and a test attached. We give a dual-loop engine built on that bound, with one admission gate that writes a hash-chained record before deployment, and we measure the gate in simulation, with a simulated agent and a seeded-search proposer rather than language models. Across three families of supervisory re-interpretation at three severities, 10 seeds each, the gated loop admitted 144 of 7,449 candidate changes, none of…

Agent parse

Actionable summary

Treat The Harness as the Only Mutable Surface: Compliance-Bounded Self-Evolution of LLM Agents in Credit Pipelines, with a Measured Admission Gate as an official publication signal. Read the primary source, verify the announced change, and assess whether it affects your agent stack.

Agent usefulness
80/100
Confidence
90%
Canonical data
JSON + Markdown
Next actions

What builders should check

  • Read the original arXiv Computer Science AI article before relying on this summary.
  • Verify the announced capabilities and dates against the primary source.
  • Assess whether the change affects your agent stack or evaluation plan.
Classification

Tags and routing

arxivresearchagents
Related signals

Continue the thread