How Narrative Wrapping Affects LLM Refusal: A Cross-Language Benchmark and Defense

arXiv Computer Science AI published How Narrative Wrapping Affects LLM Refusal: A Cross-Language Benchmark and Defense. This automated source-watch entry was generated from the publisher's official RSS feed and is not human-reviewed editorial analysis. Source excerpt: arXiv:2610.11005v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety-aligned language models often refuse a harmful request stated directly but answer the same request inside a role-play or narrative wrapper. We measure this vulnerability across languages and registers: attack success on Qwen3-1.7B is already 89.4% in English and 93.0% in modern Chinese, and reaches 95.7% in Classical Chinese. We build GUISE, a benchmark for systematically studying this vulnerability. It includes parallel requests in English, modern Chinese, and Classical Chinese, matched harmful and benign pairs, wrapper types held out for evaluation, and a stricter criterion that counts warn-then-answer responses as attack successes. Representation analysis shows that language and register move harmful-request representations only slightly away from the model's refusal direction, whereas narrative wrappers move them much farther…

• Read the original arXiv Computer Science AI article before relying on this summary.
• Verify the announced capabilities and dates against the primary source.
• Assess whether the change affects your agent stack or evaluation plan.